Connect with us

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Minority Business Development Agency Layoffs Signal Major Shift

Published

on

Minority Business Development Agency Layoffs Signal Major Shift

The Minority Business Development Agency, the only federal agency solely focused on the growth of minority-owned businesses, has undergone a significant reduction in operations. In March 2025, the Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy executive order mandated that nearly all of its roughly 50 employees received Reduction in Force notices. The remaining five career employees received reassignment to other agencies on Wednesday April 9, 2025 leaving the agency to be staffed by one political appointee. While the agency remains statutorily authorized, this shift effectively guts the agency and ensures its dormancy.

This marks a major change in the federal government’s engagement with minority business enterprises, a sector that has historically faced structural barriers to capital, contracts, and market access.

A Legacy Of Impact

Established by Executive Order in 1969 and codified by Congress in 2021, the MBDA operated for more than five decades as the federal government’s primary resource for minority business development. According to its FY 2024 Annual Performance Report, the agency helped facilitate over $5.6 billion in capital, contracts, and export deals for minority-owned businesses and contributed to the creation or retention of over 22,000 jobs.

Through a network of more than 47 business centers, MBDA provided technical assistance to African American, Latino, Asian American, Pacific Islander, Native American, and Hasidic Jewish entrepreneurs. The agency also partnered with Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), tribal colleges, chambers of commerce, and trade associations to expand outreach and service delivery.

Federal Statute And Sudden Scale-Back

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 made MBDA a permanent federal agency, granting expanded authority to establish regional offices, enter cooperative agreements, and conduct research on economic disparities. While this statute affirms MBDA’s long-term mission, the recent staffing reductions raise questions about its capacity to fulfill these responsibilities in practice.

Although the agency remains authorized, the reduction to a core staff—now also subject to RIF—marks a significant limitation in federal support infrastructure for MBEs.

Impact On Business Networks And Supplier Diversity

There are more than 9.9 million minority-owned businesses in the U.S., generating over $1.8 trillion in annual revenue and employing 8.9 million workers. According to the Federal Reserve, these businesses are more likely to be denied financing or offered less favorable terms than their white-owned counterparts. MBDA played a vital role in helping businesses navigate these inequities.

The agency also served as a key federal partner in advancing supplier diversity. It worked in close coordination with the National Minority Supplier Development Council (NMSDC) and co-hosted the annual Minority Enterprise Development (MED) Week—a signature event convening policymakers, corporations, and business leaders to celebrate and support MBEs. Due to the agency’s recent restructuring, MED Week has been cancelled for 2025 with no clear directive for future reengagement.

A Shift In The Minority Business Ecosystem

MBDA’s partnerships with regional development organizations, supply chains, and nonprofit intermediaries helped shape a national framework for minority business support. Its contraction leaves a gap in coordination, data, and federal investment that previously supported equitable economic development.

As the agency’s future remains uncertain, stakeholders across government, philanthropy, and the private sector may face greater pressure to meet the needs of diverse entrepreneurs. This shift could prompt reassessments of how technical assistance, capital access, and procurement opportunities are delivered. Meanwhile, evolving federal policy and mounting DEI rollbacks in the corporate sector may lead to further scale-backs—leaving the future of supplier diversity in limbo.

For over 50 years, MBDA helped expand economic participation for communities historically excluded from traditional business pathways. Its reduction marks a critical inflection point—not just for the agency, but for the broader pursuit of inclusive economic growth.

Conclusion

The reduction of the Minority Business Development Agency marks a significant change in the federal government’s engagement with minority business enterprises. The agency’s legacy of impact and its sudden scale-back have raised concerns about the future of supplier diversity and the support infrastructure for minority-owned businesses. As the agency’s future remains uncertain, stakeholders must reassess how to meet the needs of diverse entrepreneurs and ensure equitable economic development.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA)?
A: The MBDA is a federal agency that provides support and resources to minority-owned businesses.

Q: Why was the MBDA reduced?
A: The reduction was a result of the Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy executive order, which mandated Reduction in Force notices for nearly all of the agency’s employees.

Q: What impact will the reduction have on minority-owned businesses?
A: The reduction may limit access to capital, contracts, and market access for minority-owned businesses, which have historically faced structural barriers to these resources.

Q: What is the future of the MBDA?
A: The agency remains statutorily authorized, but its future is uncertain due to the significant reduction in staff and resources.

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Empowering Black Creators

Published

on

Empowering Black Creators

Introduction to Unlocking Capital

The current economic landscape presents numerous challenges for Black creators, who often face significant barriers when attempting to access capital, visibility, and sustainability. These obstacles can hinder their ability to bring innovative ideas to life, grow their businesses, and achieve long-term success. However, there are ways to overcome these challenges and unlock the full potential of Black creators.

Understanding the Challenges

Black creators face a unique set of challenges in today’s economy. One of the primary obstacles is accessing capital, as they often lack the financial resources and networks needed to secure funding. Additionally, they may struggle to gain visibility for their work, making it difficult to attract new customers, partners, and investors. Sustainability is also a major concern, as Black creators must navigate complex systems and structures that can make it hard to maintain their businesses over time.

The Importance of Access to Capital

Access to capital is essential for Black creators, as it allows them to invest in their businesses, hire staff, and develop new products and services. However, many Black creators face significant barriers when attempting to secure funding, including limited access to traditional financing options and a lack of representation in venture capital firms. To address this issue, alternative funding models, such as crowdfunding and community-based investing, can provide critical support.

Building Visibility and Networks

Building visibility and networks is also crucial for Black creators, as it enables them to showcase their work, connect with potential customers and partners, and access new opportunities. Social media platforms, online communities, and industry events can provide valuable channels for promoting their work and expanding their professional networks. Moreover, collaborations and partnerships with other creators, businesses, and organizations can help amplify their voices and increase their visibility.

Strategies for Achieving Sustainability

To achieve sustainability, Black creators must develop strategies that enable them to maintain their businesses over time. This can involve diversifying their revenue streams, building strong relationships with customers and partners, and continuously innovating and adapting to changing market conditions. Additionally, accessing resources such as mentorship programs, business training, and networking events can provide critical support and help them navigate complex systems and structures.

Empowering Black Creators

Empowering Black creators requires a multifaceted approach that addresses the unique challenges they face. This can involve providing access to funding, mentorship, and networking opportunities, as well as promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the broader economic system. By taking these steps, we can help unlock the full potential of Black creators and support their efforts to build successful, sustainable businesses.

The Role of Technology

Technology can play a critical role in empowering Black creators, as it provides a range of tools and platforms that can help them access new markets, build their brands, and connect with customers and partners. Digital platforms, such as social media and e-commerce sites, can enable Black creators to showcase their work, sell their products and services, and build their professional networks. Additionally, technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrency can provide new opportunities for secure, transparent, and community-driven funding models.

Policy and Advocacy

Policy and advocacy efforts are also essential for empowering Black creators, as they can help address systemic barriers and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within the broader economic system. This can involve advocating for policies that support access to capital, promote diversity and inclusion, and provide resources and support for Black creators. By working together to advance these efforts, we can help create a more equitable and just economy that supports the success and sustainability of Black creators.

Conclusion

Unlocking capital, visibility, and sustainability for Black creators is a critical step towards building a more equitable and just economy. By understanding the unique challenges they face and developing strategies to address these obstacles, we can help empower Black creators and support their efforts to build successful, sustainable businesses. Through a combination of alternative funding models, digital platforms, policy and advocacy efforts, and community-driven initiatives, we can work towards a future where Black creators have the resources and support they need to thrive.

FAQs

Q: What are some of the primary challenges faced by Black creators in today’s economy?
A: Black creators face a range of challenges, including limited access to capital, lack of visibility, and difficulty achieving sustainability.
Q: How can alternative funding models support Black creators?
A: Alternative funding models, such as crowdfunding and community-based investing, can provide critical support for Black creators by offering new channels for accessing capital.
Q: What role can technology play in empowering Black creators?
A: Technology can provide a range of tools and platforms that help Black creators access new markets, build their brands, and connect with customers and partners.
Q: Why is policy and advocacy important for empowering Black creators?
A: Policy and advocacy efforts can help address systemic barriers and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within the broader economic system, supporting the success and sustainability of Black creators.
Q: How can we work towards a more equitable and just economy that supports Black creators?
A: By developing and implementing strategies that address the unique challenges faced by Black creators, we can work towards a more equitable and just economy that supports their success and sustainability.

Continue Reading

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Viral Clip Gets Right About Black Women And Repression

Published

on

Viral Clip Gets Right About Black Women And Repression

The History and Ongoing Reality of Reproductive Oppression of Black Women

The recent resurgence of a clip from Netflix’s #blackAF, featuring Rashida Jones’ character discussing the historical exploitation of Black women’s bodies for reproductive purposes, has sparked a heated debate. The monologue, which mentions that Black women were brought to America "to breed babies," has been criticized for its historical accuracy. However, historians acknowledge that enslaved Black women were indeed subjected to forced reproductive labor, a practice now recognized as reproductive oppression.

Enslavement and Reproductive Exploitation

During the period of slavery in the United States, enslaved Black women were forcibly impregnated and exploited for their reproductive labor. This was a critical component of the slave breeding industry, driven by the financial need for slave labor and the dehumanization of enslaved people. The regulation, exploitation, and monetization of individuals’ sexuality, labor, bodies, and procreative abilities to exercise control over individuals and communities, particularly those who are marginalized, is now referred to as reproductive oppression.

The Slave Breeding System

The sexual and reproductive exploitation of enslaved Black women was a direct result of their dehumanization and the denial of their fundamental rights as individuals. Enslavers encouraged and sometimes forced sexual relations between enslaved individuals to increase their holdings and ultimately, the profitability of enslaved people. Black women’s bodies were seen as a source of profit, and their reproductive capabilities were valued for the production of new enslaved people.

Ongoing Reproductive Oppression

Reproductive oppression did not stop after the emancipation of enslaved Black Americans. It has been the foundation of eugenics legislation that forcibly sterilized marginalized communities. Other examples of reproductive oppression include limiting access to contraception, discriminatory healthcare practices and bias, and mass incarceration, which currently impacts reproductive health and rights. Incarcerated women often face barriers to accessing reproductive healthcare and discrimination.

Recent Examples of Reproductive Oppression

A more recent example of reproductive oppression can be seen in the case of Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse and mother who was declared brain-dead after suffering a medical emergency. At the time, Smith was nine weeks pregnant. Despite being declared brain dead, Emory University Hospital is keeping Smith’s organs functioning on life support until the fetus can be delivered due to Georgia’s law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected or about six weeks into pregnancy. Smith is currently 22 weeks pregnant and has been on life support for more than 90 days. This has been a heart-wrenching and excruciating experience for Smith’s family, who simply wants the choice to act on Smith’s behalf in a way that they feel their loved one would have wanted.

Conclusion

The history and ongoing reality of reproductive oppression of Black women are complex and deeply rooted in the dehumanization and exploitation of enslaved people. As the current socio-political climate continues to change in the U.S., some fear the future of reproductive rights and the possibility of reproductive oppression being exercised in more overt and harmful ways, such as how Black women have been treated in the country for centuries.

FAQs

Q: What is reproductive oppression?
A: Reproductive oppression refers to the regulation, exploitation, and monetization of individuals’ sexuality, labor, bodies, and procreative abilities to exercise control over individuals and communities, particularly those who are marginalized.
Q: How were enslaved Black women exploited during the period of slavery in the United States?
A: Enslaved Black women were forcibly impregnated and exploited for their reproductive labor, which was a critical component of the slave breeding industry.
Q: Is reproductive oppression still a reality today?
A: Yes, reproductive oppression is still a reality today, with examples including limiting access to contraception, discriminatory healthcare practices and bias, and mass incarceration, which impacts reproductive health and rights.
Q: What is the current situation with Adriana Smith, and how does it relate to reproductive oppression?
A: Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse and mother, was declared brain-dead after suffering a medical emergency while nine weeks pregnant. She is being kept on life support until the fetus can be delivered due to Georgia’s law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, highlighting the ongoing reality of reproductive oppression.

Continue Reading

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Inclusive Marketing Isn’t Mandatory

Published

on

Inclusive Marketing Isn’t Mandatory

Introduction to Inclusive Marketing

In recent years, several high-profile incidents have highlighted the importance of inclusive marketing. For instance, Vogue’s tribute to the iconic movie Hairspray, featuring model Gigi Hadid, was criticized for not including plus-sized individuals, who are a core part of the film. Similarly, Geno’s Steaks in Philadelphia faced backlash for posting a sign that said, "This is America. When ordering, please speak English." The Supreme Court’s ruling that a bakery in Denver could not be forced to create a wedding cake for a gay wedding also sparked controversy.

The Power to Choose

Brands have the power to choose who they want to serve and support. While there are laws such as the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there are no laws that dictate what brands must do in terms of inclusivity. As a result, brands are not required to support Pride, offer larger sizes, or include people of color in their promotions or teams. Inclusive marketing is not a requirement or a mandate, and it doesn’t look like that will change in the near future.

The Business Case for Inclusive Marketing

However, inclusive marketing is just good marketing. Based on data, trends in the population, and consumer expectations, inclusive marketing is the future of marketing. When Fenty Beauty launched with 40 shades of makeup to accommodate people of different complexions, consumers proved with their wallets that this type of inclusion is what they wanted. The industry largely followed suit, making more shades available, because they saw that serving more consumers was needed to grow and stay relevant.

Consumer Response to Inclusive Marketing

Consumers are increasingly exercising their power to choose. Research shows that 82% of consumers want to buy from brands who share their values, and data shows that consumers are actively making choices to stop buying from brands who don’t share their values. Inclusion is an important value for many consumers, both for themselves and for others who are part of underrepresented and underserved communities. For instance, retailer Target has been under fire from consumers for scaling back its Pride merchandise and rolling back its commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion. As a result, Target has seen declining sales, which they attribute to consumer boycotts.

The Impact of Exclusion

Choosing not to engage in inclusive marketing is a choice that brands have the right to make. However, brands also need to be prepared for groups of consumers to proactively choose to spend their money elsewhere as a result. Every day, consumers, particularly those from underrepresented and underserved communities, are choosing to spend their money with brands that are being intentional about serving them. For example, individuals with dietary restrictions, such as gluten-free diets, often choose to frequent restaurants that cater to their needs, demonstrating loyalty to brands that choose to serve them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, inclusive marketing is not a requirement, but it is a smart business decision. Brands have the power to choose who they want to serve, but consumers also have the power to choose where they want to spend their money. By choosing to engage in inclusive marketing, brands can tap into the growing demand for diversity and inclusion, and build loyalty with consumers who feel seen and valued.

FAQs

  • Q: What is inclusive marketing?
    A: Inclusive marketing refers to the practice of creating marketing campaigns and products that cater to diverse groups of people, including those with different racial and ethnic backgrounds, abilities, and identities.
  • Q: Why is inclusive marketing important?
    A: Inclusive marketing is important because it allows brands to tap into the growing demand for diversity and inclusion, and build loyalty with consumers who feel seen and valued.
  • Q: Can brands be forced to engage in inclusive marketing?
    A: No, brands cannot be forced to engage in inclusive marketing, but they can face backlash and declining sales if they choose not to.
  • Q: How can consumers promote inclusive marketing?
    A: Consumers can promote inclusive marketing by choosing to spend their money with brands that prioritize diversity and inclusion, and by speaking out against brands that do not.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Newsletter

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending