Innovation and Technology
Starlink Launch Imminent In South Africa

South Africa has published a “proposed policy direction” that should allow Elon Musk’s Starlink to sidestep the strict ownership requirements in the country’s telecoms sector and launch in the country of his birth. Telcos must have a 30% ownership by historically disadvantaged groups, in line with the country’s black economic empowerment (BEE) laws adopted after the end of Apartheid in 1994.
Current Telecoms Sector Requirements
The telecoms sector, however, has much stricter ownership requirements than the broader information, communication and technology (ICT) sector, which allows for “equity equivalent investments” in training, supporting small businesses and building infrastructure. This distinction has posed a challenge for foreign companies looking to invest in South Africa’s telecoms sector.
Proposed Policy Changes
SA Communications Minister Solly Malatsi on Friday published a “proposed policy direction” that will allow the country’s telecoms regulator, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa), to sidestep those strict ownership strictures in lieu of newer BEE legal amendments. This includes the country’s Amended Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) ICT Sector Code. This means Starlink will be able to use “equity equivalent investments programmes” as its contribution to BEE requirements for foreign investment.
Implications of the Policy Direction
Other major tech firms, including Microsoft and Google, operate their South African subsidiaries using this economic model. After being published in South Africa’s official Government Gazette on 23 May 25, this official instruction from the communications minister will give the regulator Icasa the legal authority to “harmonise” the laws that govern it with the new ICT Sector Code and other amendments. The communications department quotes the World Bank statistic, that for every 10% increase in broadband penetration in a country, there is a 1.21% growth in GDP.
Goals of the New Policy
“The focus of this policy direction is on lowering regulatory hurdles to investment in reliable broadband and ensuring access to the internet,” the document reads. “Policy clarity on the recognition of the equity equivalent investment programmes has long been sought by multinational operators in the ICT industry. This will provide the certainty necessary to attract increased investment in ICT and accelerator universal internet access.”
Addressing Misconceptions and Future Plans
Musk has incorrectly claimed that Starlink is “not allowed to operate in South Africa because I’m not black,” as he tweeted on X in February. South Africa has very poor telecommunications in rural areas, where a satellite-based service would be useful for achieving the intended “universal internet access.” There should be a “Starlink at every local police station,” South Africa’s richest man, Johann Rupert, told President Donald Trump during Wednesday’s controversial Oval Office meeting.
Recent Developments and Meetings
Rupert was part of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa delegation to the White House, as were SA-born golfing legends Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. Musk was also in attendance, and although Trump mentioned him, the controversial businessman did not say anything. Rupert – whose Richemont holding company owns Cartier, Mont Blanc and other luxury brands – told President Trump that while South Africa has a crime problem, there is no so-called white genocide.
Conclusion
The proposed policy direction is a significant step towards improving broadband access in South Africa, particularly in rural areas. By allowing companies like Starlink to operate under the equity equivalent investment model, the country aims to attract more investment in the ICT sector and promote universal internet access. This move is expected to have a positive impact on the country’s GDP growth, as increased broadband penetration is linked to economic growth.
FAQs
- Q: What is the current ownership requirement for telcos in South Africa?
A: Telcos must have a 30% ownership by historically disadvantaged groups. - Q: What is the proposed policy direction regarding foreign investment in the telecoms sector?
A: The proposed policy direction allows for “equity equivalent investments programmes” as a contribution to BEE requirements for foreign investment. - Q: How will this policy direction impact Starlink’s operations in South Africa?
A: Starlink will be able to operate in South Africa using the equity equivalent investment model, allowing it to sidestep the strict ownership requirements. - Q: What are the expected benefits of this policy direction?
A: The policy direction is expected to attract more investment in the ICT sector, promote universal internet access, and contribute to GDP growth.
Innovation and Technology
Defining Innovative Leadership

Introduction to Innovative Leadership
Innovative leaders are the driving force behind successful organizations, fostering a culture of creativity, experimentation, and continuous improvement. They possess a unique set of skills, traits, and mindsets that enable them to navigate complex challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and propel their organizations forward. In this article, we will delve into the characteristics, behaviors, and strategies that define innovative leaders and explore how they inspire and empower their teams to achieve exceptional results.
Key Characteristics of Innovative Leaders
Innovative leaders exhibit a distinct set of characteristics that set them apart from traditional leaders. These include:
- A growth mindset, embracing lifelong learning and self-improvement
- A willingness to take calculated risks and experiment with new approaches
- A customer-centric focus, prioritizing the needs and expectations of their target audience
- A collaborative approach, fostering open communication and cross-functional teamwork
- A passion for innovation, seeking out new ideas and technologies to drive growth and improvement
Strategic Thinking and Vision
Innovative leaders are strategic thinkers, able to envision and communicate a compelling future for their organization. They possess a deep understanding of the market, industry trends, and emerging technologies, allowing them to anticipate and respond to changing circumstances. This strategic thinking enables them to make informed decisions, allocate resources effectively, and drive innovation across the organization.
Fostering a Culture of Innovation
Innovative leaders recognize that a culture of innovation is essential for driving growth and success. They create an environment that encourages experimentation, learning from failure, and continuous improvement. This culture is characterized by:
- Psychological safety, where employees feel empowered to share their ideas and take risks
- Diversity and inclusion, bringing together diverse perspectives and experiences to drive innovation
- Autonomy and ownership, giving employees the freedom to make decisions and take responsibility for their work
- Feedback and recognition, providing regular feedback and acknowledging and rewarding innovative achievements
Building and Empowering Teams
Innovative leaders understand the importance of building and empowering high-performing teams. They:
- Attract and retain top talent, seeking out individuals with diverse skills and experiences
- Develop and coach their teams, providing opportunities for growth and development
- Foster a sense of community and collaboration, encouraging open communication and teamwork
- Empower their teams to make decisions and take ownership of their work, providing the necessary resources and support
Driving Innovation and Growth
Innovative leaders drive innovation and growth by:
- Encouraging experimentation and learning from failure
- Investing in research and development, exploring new technologies and trends
- Fostering partnerships and collaborations, leveraging external expertise and resources
- Monitoring and measuring innovation, tracking progress and adjusting strategies as needed
Overcoming Challenges and Embracing Change
Innovative leaders are adept at navigating complex challenges and embracing change. They:
- Stay agile and adaptable, responding quickly to changing circumstances
- Foster a culture of resilience, encouraging employees to learn from setbacks and failures
- Communicate effectively, keeping stakeholders informed and engaged throughout times of change
- Lead by example, demonstrating their own commitment to innovation and growth
Conclusion
Innovative leaders are the catalysts for growth, innovation, and success in today’s fast-paced and ever-changing business landscape. By possessing a unique set of characteristics, traits, and mindsets, they inspire and empower their teams to achieve exceptional results. By understanding the key characteristics, behaviors, and strategies of innovative leaders, organizations can develop their own leaders and foster a culture of innovation, driving growth, improvement, and success.
FAQs
Q: What are the key characteristics of innovative leaders?
A: Innovative leaders exhibit a growth mindset, a willingness to take calculated risks, a customer-centric focus, a collaborative approach, and a passion for innovation.
Q: How do innovative leaders foster a culture of innovation?
A: Innovative leaders create an environment that encourages experimentation, learning from failure, and continuous improvement, characterized by psychological safety, diversity and inclusion, autonomy and ownership, and feedback and recognition.
Q: What strategies do innovative leaders use to drive innovation and growth?
A: Innovative leaders drive innovation and growth by encouraging experimentation and learning from failure, investing in research and development, fostering partnerships and collaborations, and monitoring and measuring innovation.
Q: How do innovative leaders overcome challenges and embrace change?
A: Innovative leaders stay agile and adaptable, foster a culture of resilience, communicate effectively, and lead by example, demonstrating their own commitment to innovation and growth.
Innovation and Technology
AI and Automation in Ethics and Morality

AI and automation for impact is transforming industries and revolutionizing the way we live and work. As we continue to develop and implement AI and automation technologies, we must consider the ethical and moral implications of these advancements. From job displacement to bias in decision-making, the consequences of AI and automation on society are far-reaching and multifaceted.
Understanding AI and Automation
AI and automation refer to the use of computer systems to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. These technologies have the potential to increase efficiency, productivity, and accuracy, but they also raise important questions about accountability, transparency, and fairness.
Types of AI and Automation
There are several types of AI and automation, including machine learning, natural language processing, and robotics. Machine learning involves training algorithms on large datasets to enable them to make predictions and decisions. Natural language processing enables computers to understand and generate human language, while robotics involves the use of physical machines to perform tasks.
Applications of AI and Automation
AI and automation are being applied in a wide range of industries, from healthcare and finance to transportation and education. In healthcare, AI is being used to diagnose diseases and develop personalized treatment plans. In finance, AI is being used to detect fraud and optimize investment portfolios.
Ethics and Morality in AI and Automation
As AI and automation become increasingly pervasive, it is essential to consider the ethical and moral implications of these technologies. One of the primary concerns is job displacement, as AI and automation replace human workers in certain industries.
Job Displacement and the Future of Work
The impact of AI and automation on employment is a pressing concern. While these technologies have the potential to create new job opportunities, they also risk displacing human workers, particularly in sectors where tasks are repetitive or can be easily automated.
Bias and Discrimination in AI and Automation
Another significant concern is bias and discrimination in AI and automation. If these technologies are trained on biased data, they may perpetuate and even amplify existing social inequalities. For example, facial recognition systems have been shown to be less accurate for people of color, leading to concerns about racial bias.
Accountability and Transparency in AI and Automation
As AI and automation make decisions that affect people’s lives, it is essential to ensure that these technologies are transparent and accountable. This requires developing explainable AI systems that can provide insights into their decision-making processes.
Real-World Examples of AI and Automation in Ethics and Morality
There are several real-world examples of AI and automation in ethics and morality. For instance, self-driving cars raise important questions about accountability and liability in the event of an accident.
Self-Driving Cars and Accountability
Self-driving cars are being tested on public roads, but there are still many unanswered questions about accountability and liability. Who is responsible if a self-driving car is involved in an accident? The manufacturer, the owner, or the passenger?
AI-Powered Healthcare and Patient Rights
AI is being used in healthcare to diagnose diseases and develop personalized treatment plans. However, this raises important questions about patient rights and confidentiality. Who owns the data generated by AI-powered healthcare systems, and how is it protected?
Future Directions for AI and Automation in Ethics and Morality
As AI and automation continue to evolve, it is essential to prioritize ethics and morality. This requires developing frameworks and guidelines for the responsible development and deployment of these technologies.
Developing Frameworks for Responsible AI and Automation
Developing frameworks for responsible AI and automation requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving experts from fields such as computer science, philosophy, and law. These frameworks must address issues such as bias, accountability, and transparency.
Education and Awareness about AI and Automation
Educating the public about AI and automation is crucial for ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. This requires raising awareness about the benefits and risks of AI and automation, as well as promoting critical thinking and media literacy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, AI and automation have the potential to transform industries and revolutionize the way we live and work. However, these technologies also raise important questions about ethics and morality. As we continue to develop and implement AI and automation, it is essential to prioritize accountability, transparency, and fairness. By developing frameworks for responsible AI and automation and promoting education and awareness, we can ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed for the benefit of all.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is AI and automation?
A: AI and automation refer to the use of computer systems to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making.
Q: What are the benefits of AI and automation?
A: The benefits of AI and automation include increased efficiency, productivity, and accuracy. These technologies have the potential to transform industries and revolutionize the way we live and work.
Q: What are the risks of AI and automation?
A: The risks of AI and automation include job displacement, bias and discrimination, and lack of accountability and transparency. These technologies also raise important questions about ethics and morality.
Q: How can we ensure that AI and automation are developed and deployed responsibly?
A: Ensuring that AI and automation are developed and deployed responsibly requires developing frameworks and guidelines for the responsible development and deployment of these technologies. This also requires promoting education and awareness about AI and automation, as well as prioritizing accountability, transparency, and fairness.
Q: What is the future of AI and automation?
A: The future of AI and automation is uncertain, but it is clear that these technologies will continue to evolve and become increasingly pervasive. As we continue to develop and implement AI and automation, it is essential to prioritize ethics and morality and ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed for the benefit of all.
Innovation and Technology
AI Revolution Without a Blueprint

Introduction to AI and Humanity
As someone who spends most of my waking hours exploring how emerging technologies transform business and society, I occasionally encounter perspectives that fundamentally shift how I view our technological future. My recent conversation with Richard Susskind, leading AI expert and author of "How to Think About AI: A Guide for the Perplexed," provided exactly that kind of paradigm-shifting insight. His latest book offers a comprehensive framework for understanding AI’s potential and pitfalls, going well beyond the superficial analyses that dominate today’s conversation.
Saving Humanity With And From AI
When I asked Susskind to unpack his view that AI represents "the defining challenge of our age," he explained that we must simultaneously embrace two seemingly contradictory mindsets. "On the one hand, this technology offers remarkable, perhaps even unprecedented promise for humans and civilization. On the other hand, in bad hands or misused, it could pose some very elemental threats to us," Susskind told me. This duality requires us to move beyond polarized thinking about AI as either salvation or destruction.
Understanding AI: Process vs. Outcome Thinkers
What makes Susskind’s analysis particularly valuable is his ability to distinguish between different ways of thinking about AI. He separates "process thinkers" focused on how AI works from "outcome thinkers" concerned with what AI achieves. "When people say machines can’t be creative or they can’t exercise judgment, I think that’s process thinking," Susskind explained. "What they’re thinking about is that machines cannot think, cannot reason, cannot empathize, cannot create in the way that humans do." But the real story, according to Susskind, lies elsewhere: "Machines that most AI people are working on are not seeking to replicate the way humans work. They’re seeking to provide outcomes that match or even are better than those of human beings, but using their own distinctive capabilities."
Inadequate Conceptual Frameworks
Perhaps the most thought-provoking aspect of our conversation centered on how our existing language and conceptual frameworks fail to capture what AI is becoming. Susskind compared our current situation to the pre-industrial era, when concepts like "capitalism" and "factory" didn’t yet exist. "I don’t think it is accurate to say that a machine is creative because I think creativity is a distinctively human process," Susskind said. "But do machines create novel output? Can they configure ideas or concepts or drawings or words in ways that have never been done before? Yes, they certainly can." This gap in our vocabulary extends to how we relate to AI systems. "I find myself saying please and thank you to these machines. When I use them, I find myself wanting to apologize for wasting its time," Susskind admitted. While this behavior might seem strange, it points to the emergence of relationships with machines "for which we have no words today."
The Problem With Automation Thinking
One of Susskind’s most important insights is that simply grafting AI onto existing institutions like courts, hospitals, or schools won’t deliver transformative benefits. He distinguishes between three approaches to technology: automation, innovation, and elimination. "Automating is when we computerize, we systematize, we streamline, we optimize what we already do today," Susskind explained. "Innovation [is] using technology to allow us to do things that previously weren’t possible. And elimination [is] elimination of the tasks for which the human service used to exist." This distinction is crucial because most organizations are stuck in automation thinking. "I think the mindset is still very much about AI as a tool to improve what they currently do," Susskind observed. This approach misses the bigger opportunity.
Transforming Industries
To illustrate, Susskind shared a story about addressing 2,000 neurosurgeons: "I started off by saying patients don’t want neurosurgeons [gasp in audience]. I said, patients want health. And I said, for a particular type of health problem, you are the best answer we have today. And thank goodness for you." But the future might look very different. "What AI will provide us with is preventative medicine," Susskind continued. Instead of simply automating surgery or medical diagnoses, AI could fundamentally transform how we approach healthcare altogether. "Increasingly, AI systems, in all walks of life, will be able to provide early warnings of difficulty," he explained. Susskind envisions nano-scale monitoring systems that could detect health problems before they manifest as symptoms, eliminating the need for many medical interventions entirely. "Everyone wants a fence at the top of the cliff rather than an ambulance at the bottom," he noted, highlighting how AI might eliminate problems rather than just automate solutions.
The Mountain Range Of Threats
Despite his generally optimistic outlook, Susskind doesn’t minimize AI’s risks. He categorizes them into a "mountain range of threats," including existential risks (threats to humanity’s survival), catastrophic risks (massive but non-extinction level harms), socioeconomic risks (like technological unemployment), and what he calls the risk of "failing to use these technologies." On technological unemployment, Susskind raises profound questions: "If machines can indeed perform all tasks that humans can perform, what will we do in life, but economically, how will people earn a living? How will people have any income security?" Even more concerning is the concentration of AI power: "Currently, the data, the processing, the chips, the capability is in the hands of a very small number of non-state-based organizations," Susskind noted. "This is a fundamental risk and a fundamental question of political philosophy. How is it that we can or should redistribute the wealth created by these AI systems in circumstances where the wealth is created and simultaneously the old wealth creators are no longer needed?"
The Need for Interdisciplinary Approach
The challenges AI presents require expertise far beyond technical knowledge. "We need to call up an army of our very best, our best economists, our best sociologists, our best lawyers, our best business people, our best policy makers," Susskind urged. "This is our Apollo mission. It’s of that scale." While acknowledging the brilliance of many technologists, Susskind believes they shouldn’t dominate these conversations alone: "First of all, we need diversity of thinking. But secondly, technologists may be wonderful in technology, but their experience of ethical reasoning, their experience of lawmaking and regulation formulation, their experience of policymaking is likely to be minimal."
The Pace Of Change Is Accelerating
Perhaps most sobering is Susskind’s assessment of how quickly AI will advance. "In the early days of AI, say in the fifties, sixties and seventies, we had breakthroughs every five to 10 years. We’re now seeing breakthroughs, not necessarily technological breakthroughs, but breakthroughs in usage, and ideas, probably every six to 12 months." He points to an astonishing trajectory: "We know that the computing resource, compute people call it, available to train AI systems, is doubling every six months. That means we’ll see 20 doublings in the next decade. That will be two to the power of 20, a 1-billion-fold increase in the power available to train these systems." Susskind believes we should plan for artificial general intelligence arriving between 2030 and 2035. While he’s not certain it will arrive in that timeframe, he believes the possibility is significant enough to warrant serious preparation.
A Cosmic Perspective
In the most thought-provoking moment of our conversation, Susskind shared what he calls the "AI evolution hypothesis" from cosmologists like Lord Martin Rees: "The universe is 13.8 billion years old. Humanity’s been around for a couple of hundred thousand years. In cosmic terms, we’re simply a blink of the eye. It may well be that the only contribution that humanity makes to the cosmos is to create this much greater intelligence that will in due course pervade the universe and replace us." While many will dismiss this as science fiction, it highlights the profound transformation AI might represent, a shift potentially greater than the move from oral to written communication or the invention of the printing press.
Conclusion
As we navigate this uncharted territory, Susskind’s balanced approach, acknowledging both immense promise and peril, provides a valuable guide. The question isn’t whether AI will transform our world, but how thoughtfully we’ll manage that transformation. The answer may determine not just our future prosperity, but our very existence.
FAQs
-
What is the main challenge of our age, according to Richard Susskind?
- The main challenge of our age, according to Richard Susskind, is AI, which represents both unprecedented promise for humans and civilization and elemental threats if misused.
-
What are the three approaches to technology identified by Susskind?
- The three approaches are automation (computerizing, systematizing, streamlining, and optimizing what we already do), innovation (using technology to do things previously not possible), and elimination (eliminating tasks for which human services used to exist).
-
What does Susskind mean by "process thinkers" and "outcome thinkers"?
- Susskind distinguishes between "process thinkers" who focus on how AI works and "outcome thinkers" who are concerned with what AI achieves, emphasizing that the real story lies in AI providing outcomes that match or exceed human capabilities using its own distinctive methods.
-
How does Susskind categorize the risks associated with AI?
- Susskind categorizes AI risks into a "mountain range of threats," including existential risks, catastrophic risks, socioeconomic risks, and the risk of failing to use these technologies effectively.
- What is the "AI evolution hypothesis" mentioned by Susskind?
- The "AI evolution hypothesis" suggests that humanity’s contribution to the cosmos might be creating a greater
-
Career Advice6 months ago
Interview with Dr. Kristy K. Taylor, WORxK Global News Magazine Founder
-
Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)6 months ago
Sarah Herrlinger Talks AirPods Pro Hearing Aid
-
Career Advice6 months ago
NetWork Your Way to Success: Top Tips for Maximizing Your Professional Network
-
Changemaker Interviews5 months ago
Unlocking Human Potential: Kim Groshek’s Journey to Transforming Leadership and Stress Resilience
-
Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)6 months ago
The Power of Belonging: Why Feeling Accepted Matters in the Workplace
-
Global Trends and Politics6 months ago
Health-care stocks fall after Warren PBM bill, Brian Thompson shooting
-
Global Trends and Politics6 months ago
Unionization Goes Mainstream: How the Changing Workforce is Driving Demand for Collective Bargaining
-
Training and Development6 months ago
Level Up: How Upskilling Can Help You Stay Ahead of the Curve in a Rapidly Changing Industry