Connect with us

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Trump’s DEI Rollback and Disability Inclusion

Published

on

Trump’s DEI Rollback and Disability Inclusion

President Trump Terminates Federal Government Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programs

Executive Order Sees End to Diversity Consideration in Hiring and Training

A mere day into his second term in office and President Donald Trump has already made good on his vow to terminate federal government diversity, equity, and inclusion programs which he has described as “illegal and immoral.”

Tuesday’s Executive Order will see federal government agencies cease to consider diversity within hiring protocols and remove it from employee training programs. Furthermore, all federal employees who work in DEI programs have now been placed on paid leave and those agencies employing them tasked with submitting a written plan for their dismissal by January 31. Businesses benefiting from minority funding programs are also in line to experience the shockwaves of the President’s vilification of what fellow conservatives view as the infiltration of wokeism into American culture and politics necessitating an end to policies promoting affirmative action.

Corporate America Anticipates Policy Shift

Corporate America has not been slow in anticipating the policy sea change away from that of the outgoing Biden administration. Meta, Amazon, McDonalds, and Walmart all recently announced a major scaling back and reframing of their DEI initiatives.

In an internal memo initially reported by Axios Meta attributed its retrenchment of DEI to a “shifting legal and policy landscape” while also asserting that the term “DEI” had become “charged.”

Disability Inclusion Left Out of the Conversation

Despite the current noise around DEI, those looking to read up and research what all this might mean for disability inclusion in particular would appear to be out of luck. References to disability within this particular news buzz would appear to be conspicuous by their absence with a far greater emphasis being placed on gender and race in particular. However, for disability activists, this is unlikely to be reason enough to breathe a sigh of relief. Disability, despite being one of the largest, intersectional, and non-partisan diversity segments of all, has always been something of a poor cousin within the corporate DEI world and has often faced an uphill task to bring itself to the boardroom table.

Backlash Against the DEI Backlash

There also appears to be already emerging a backlash against the DEI backlash from other sections of corporate America. The likes of Costco, Apple, and Delta have already come out publicly in steadfast support of a continuation of their DEI policies despite the current climate. In quotes provided over email Sander van ‘t Noordende, CEO of recruitment giant Randstad said, “Some businesses are rolling back on their equity-based programs, but most businesses I talk to are navigating and staying the course. Why? Because it’s good for business. The workplace should be a high-trust environment. Our research shows that less than half (49%) of talent trust their employers to create a working culture where everyone can thrive. Employers need to work on bringing this higher, and not putting that trust at risk.”

What’s Next for Disability Hiring?

As far as disability hiring is concerned, what happens next in all likelihood spins on a fairly predictable fork in the road ahead. Disability inclusion may suffer intensely from the “last in, first out” effect that has characterized its slow ascent to the top of the boardroom agenda in comparison to other segments. On the other hand, as a bi-partisan issue that has often been viewed outside the anti-woke backlash, it might just receive some shielding from the ongoing fracas. Better still, the current polarization should require a sharpening of minds and renewed drive and determination amongst those who feel such issues are just too important to stop fighting for.

Conclusion

The termination of federal government diversity, equity, and inclusion programs marks a significant shift in the current political landscape. While some businesses may choose to scale back their DEI initiatives, others are standing firm in their commitment to promoting a culture of inclusion. As the debate continues, it is crucial that disability inclusion remains a priority, and that efforts to promote accessibility and inclusion are not lost in the noise.

FAQs

Q: What does the Executive Order mean for federal employees working in DEI programs?

A: All federal employees who work in DEI programs have been placed on paid leave, and agencies employing them have been tasked with submitting a written plan for their dismissal by January 31.

Q: Will the AbilityOne program be affected by the Executive Order?

A: According to Bart Devon, Executive Director of the Alliance for Expanding America’s Workforce, any changes to AbilityOne would have to come through an act of Congress, and he would be reluctant to tie it to the presidency.

Q: What do other sections of corporate America think about the DEI backlash?

A: Some businesses, such as Costco, Apple, and Delta, have publicly expressed their support for continuing their DEI policies despite the current climate.

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Viral Clip Gets Right About Black Women And Repression

Published

on

Viral Clip Gets Right About Black Women And Repression

The History and Ongoing Reality of Reproductive Oppression of Black Women

The recent resurgence of a clip from Netflix’s #blackAF, featuring Rashida Jones’ character discussing the historical exploitation of Black women’s bodies for reproductive purposes, has sparked a heated debate. The monologue, which mentions that Black women were brought to America "to breed babies," has been criticized for its historical accuracy. However, historians acknowledge that enslaved Black women were indeed subjected to forced reproductive labor, a practice now recognized as reproductive oppression.

Enslavement and Reproductive Exploitation

During the period of slavery in the United States, enslaved Black women were forcibly impregnated and exploited for their reproductive labor. This was a critical component of the slave breeding industry, driven by the financial need for slave labor and the dehumanization of enslaved people. The regulation, exploitation, and monetization of individuals’ sexuality, labor, bodies, and procreative abilities to exercise control over individuals and communities, particularly those who are marginalized, is now referred to as reproductive oppression.

The Slave Breeding System

The sexual and reproductive exploitation of enslaved Black women was a direct result of their dehumanization and the denial of their fundamental rights as individuals. Enslavers encouraged and sometimes forced sexual relations between enslaved individuals to increase their holdings and ultimately, the profitability of enslaved people. Black women’s bodies were seen as a source of profit, and their reproductive capabilities were valued for the production of new enslaved people.

Ongoing Reproductive Oppression

Reproductive oppression did not stop after the emancipation of enslaved Black Americans. It has been the foundation of eugenics legislation that forcibly sterilized marginalized communities. Other examples of reproductive oppression include limiting access to contraception, discriminatory healthcare practices and bias, and mass incarceration, which currently impacts reproductive health and rights. Incarcerated women often face barriers to accessing reproductive healthcare and discrimination.

Recent Examples of Reproductive Oppression

A more recent example of reproductive oppression can be seen in the case of Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse and mother who was declared brain-dead after suffering a medical emergency. At the time, Smith was nine weeks pregnant. Despite being declared brain dead, Emory University Hospital is keeping Smith’s organs functioning on life support until the fetus can be delivered due to Georgia’s law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected or about six weeks into pregnancy. Smith is currently 22 weeks pregnant and has been on life support for more than 90 days. This has been a heart-wrenching and excruciating experience for Smith’s family, who simply wants the choice to act on Smith’s behalf in a way that they feel their loved one would have wanted.

Conclusion

The history and ongoing reality of reproductive oppression of Black women are complex and deeply rooted in the dehumanization and exploitation of enslaved people. As the current socio-political climate continues to change in the U.S., some fear the future of reproductive rights and the possibility of reproductive oppression being exercised in more overt and harmful ways, such as how Black women have been treated in the country for centuries.

FAQs

Q: What is reproductive oppression?
A: Reproductive oppression refers to the regulation, exploitation, and monetization of individuals’ sexuality, labor, bodies, and procreative abilities to exercise control over individuals and communities, particularly those who are marginalized.
Q: How were enslaved Black women exploited during the period of slavery in the United States?
A: Enslaved Black women were forcibly impregnated and exploited for their reproductive labor, which was a critical component of the slave breeding industry.
Q: Is reproductive oppression still a reality today?
A: Yes, reproductive oppression is still a reality today, with examples including limiting access to contraception, discriminatory healthcare practices and bias, and mass incarceration, which impacts reproductive health and rights.
Q: What is the current situation with Adriana Smith, and how does it relate to reproductive oppression?
A: Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old nurse and mother, was declared brain-dead after suffering a medical emergency while nine weeks pregnant. She is being kept on life support until the fetus can be delivered due to Georgia’s law banning most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, highlighting the ongoing reality of reproductive oppression.

Continue Reading

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Inclusive Marketing Isn’t Mandatory

Published

on

Inclusive Marketing Isn’t Mandatory

Introduction to Inclusive Marketing

In recent years, several high-profile incidents have highlighted the importance of inclusive marketing. For instance, Vogue’s tribute to the iconic movie Hairspray, featuring model Gigi Hadid, was criticized for not including plus-sized individuals, who are a core part of the film. Similarly, Geno’s Steaks in Philadelphia faced backlash for posting a sign that said, "This is America. When ordering, please speak English." The Supreme Court’s ruling that a bakery in Denver could not be forced to create a wedding cake for a gay wedding also sparked controversy.

The Power to Choose

Brands have the power to choose who they want to serve and support. While there are laws such as the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there are no laws that dictate what brands must do in terms of inclusivity. As a result, brands are not required to support Pride, offer larger sizes, or include people of color in their promotions or teams. Inclusive marketing is not a requirement or a mandate, and it doesn’t look like that will change in the near future.

The Business Case for Inclusive Marketing

However, inclusive marketing is just good marketing. Based on data, trends in the population, and consumer expectations, inclusive marketing is the future of marketing. When Fenty Beauty launched with 40 shades of makeup to accommodate people of different complexions, consumers proved with their wallets that this type of inclusion is what they wanted. The industry largely followed suit, making more shades available, because they saw that serving more consumers was needed to grow and stay relevant.

Consumer Response to Inclusive Marketing

Consumers are increasingly exercising their power to choose. Research shows that 82% of consumers want to buy from brands who share their values, and data shows that consumers are actively making choices to stop buying from brands who don’t share their values. Inclusion is an important value for many consumers, both for themselves and for others who are part of underrepresented and underserved communities. For instance, retailer Target has been under fire from consumers for scaling back its Pride merchandise and rolling back its commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion. As a result, Target has seen declining sales, which they attribute to consumer boycotts.

The Impact of Exclusion

Choosing not to engage in inclusive marketing is a choice that brands have the right to make. However, brands also need to be prepared for groups of consumers to proactively choose to spend their money elsewhere as a result. Every day, consumers, particularly those from underrepresented and underserved communities, are choosing to spend their money with brands that are being intentional about serving them. For example, individuals with dietary restrictions, such as gluten-free diets, often choose to frequent restaurants that cater to their needs, demonstrating loyalty to brands that choose to serve them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, inclusive marketing is not a requirement, but it is a smart business decision. Brands have the power to choose who they want to serve, but consumers also have the power to choose where they want to spend their money. By choosing to engage in inclusive marketing, brands can tap into the growing demand for diversity and inclusion, and build loyalty with consumers who feel seen and valued.

FAQs

  • Q: What is inclusive marketing?
    A: Inclusive marketing refers to the practice of creating marketing campaigns and products that cater to diverse groups of people, including those with different racial and ethnic backgrounds, abilities, and identities.
  • Q: Why is inclusive marketing important?
    A: Inclusive marketing is important because it allows brands to tap into the growing demand for diversity and inclusion, and build loyalty with consumers who feel seen and valued.
  • Q: Can brands be forced to engage in inclusive marketing?
    A: No, brands cannot be forced to engage in inclusive marketing, but they can face backlash and declining sales if they choose not to.
  • Q: How can consumers promote inclusive marketing?
    A: Consumers can promote inclusive marketing by choosing to spend their money with brands that prioritize diversity and inclusion, and by speaking out against brands that do not.
Continue Reading

Diversity and Inclusion (DEIA)

Prioritizing Mental Health Awareness

Published

on

Prioritizing Mental Health Awareness

Mental Health Awareness Month: A Priority for Inclusive Leaders

How many know that Mental Health Awareness Month originated in 1949 by the National Mental Health Association(now Mental Health America)? It started as a week but extended to a month, designed to provide awareness and resources to support mental health. Some 76 years later, we, as a nation as well as workplaces, remain challenged by how to care for and help those with mental health challenges. Consider the many told and untold stories about leaders succumbing to workplace pressures. Conversely, some struggle without care, which causes behavioral outbursts that can impact or harm others. This month provides an opportunity for inclusive leaders to not only reflect and care for their mental well-being but also to educate and raise awareness about integration for those who struggle with mental illnesses in the workplace. This article will highlight how mental health impacts the workplace and provide strategies inclusive leaders can leverage to gain support as they navigate the requirements for a truly inclusive workplace.

Defining Mental Health

According to The World Health Organization, mental health disorders include anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders, and more. The 2025 Work in America Survey cites 82% of workers who say the workplace environment moderately or drastically negatively impacts their mental health. Additionally, 70% report increased stressors around job security amidst policy and economic changes. Mental health is also a concern across generations. A Deloitte Study says Gen Z (39%) and Millennials (33%) are concerned about mental health. These statistics indicate that mental health is a core topic that deserves attention as we strive to create welcoming, productive, and innovative workplaces. Mental health is a priority because of its proximity and impact on the workplace.

The Impact of Mental Health on the Workplace

Employees impacted by mental health can be challenged with work assignments, team dynamics, and communicating values. Equally, leaders can struggle to provide adequate support for those who identify as having mental health issues that require accommodation. Research says several factors can be the cause: inadequate workplace culture, availability of mental health resources, and requisite knowledge from responsible stakeholders.

Strategies for Inclusive Leaders to Support Mental Well-Being

The world at large carries many challenges, and inclusive leaders must be well-equipped to deal with challenges that come their way on an ongoing basis. A while back, I wrote an article about Simone Biles and how she had to prioritize her mental health as she navigated the pressures around leadership and winning in the Olympics. She decided to exit the Olympics and focus on strengthening her mental well-being. A decision that won her praise and changed her career trajectory as she became an ambassador for mental health. Inclusive Leaders, similarly, can face a great deal of pressure around getting inclusion right in the workplace. Consider how many dimensions of diversity make up the workplace and the pressure to be inclusive. Since we’re talking about mental health awareness month, let’s acknowledge the many complexities involved in better understanding disorders in that space. This is a large task for those who strive to be inclusive leaders.

Olympic Champion and Mental Health Ambassador Simone Biles proves prioritizing mental health is a winning strategy.

Below are four strategies to help inclusive leaders care for their mental well-being while on the transformative leadership journey.

  1. Find a therapist to support leadership transformation while allowing for the unpacking of inclusion challenges. As an example, let’s revisit the Simone Biles piece. She validated the effectiveness of having scripts from her therapists to deal with pressure-packed situations. Inclusive leaders should note that therapists can help create a robust toolkit for workplace challenges.
  2. Leaders should invest adequate time appreciating their unique values. Know when the inclusion tank is low and when to step aside for rejuvenation. This could include time away from the office and connecting in feel-good situations.
  3. Create a supportive community that can be an outlet when those challenging moments threaten mental well-being.
  4. Practice the ability to speak and share authentically. Track progress. Oftentimes, when we go inward and experience an overwhelming message that isn’t released appropriately, there can be health ramifications.

Conclusion

Mental health awareness is crucial for creating a welcoming and productive workplace. Inclusive leaders must prioritize their mental well-being and provide support for their employees. By understanding the impact of mental health on the workplace and implementing strategies to support mental well-being, leaders can create a positive and inclusive work environment. As we continue to navigate the complexities of mental health, it is essential to remember that mental health is a priority, and it requires attention and care from all of us.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is Mental Health Awareness Month?
A: Mental Health Awareness Month is a month-long awareness campaign that originated in 1949 to provide awareness and resources to support mental health.

Q: How does mental health impact the workplace?
A: Mental health can impact the workplace by affecting employees’ ability to complete work assignments, interact with team members, and communicate values. It can also impact leaders’ ability to provide adequate support for employees with mental health issues.

Q: What strategies can inclusive leaders use to support mental well-being?
A: Inclusive leaders can use strategies such as finding a therapist, investing time in self-care, creating a supportive community, and practicing authentic communication to support their mental well-being.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Our Newsletter

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending